F’ Off Shore 24th January 2016

The big news this week is Google agreeing to pay £130m in back taxes after an “open audit” of its accounts by the UK tax authorities.

The payment covers money owed since 2005 and follows a six-year inquiry by Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs.

It will be safe to assume that the inquiry has probably cost more than the £130m in lawyers and advisors, and that the tax represents a fraction of the company’s wealth it generates in the UK.

Google is one of several multinational companies to have been accused of avoiding tax, despite making billions of pounds worth of sales in Britain. It’s not a new subject on my radar and it’s great to see that whilst the amounts that they are paying are pathetic, moving forward the government is adopting a “sales tax” that looks at turnover generated inside the UK.  It’s an idea I blogged about in 2012.

images

Matt Brittin of Google talks turnover to HMRC probe …. it was this big.

Despite the UK being one of Google’s biggest markets, it agreed to pay just £20.4m in taxes in 2013 from sales in Britain totalling £3.8bn.

Google has been criticised for its complex international tax structures and is not alone in its tax avoidance plan; it is one of a handful of international giants, including Microsoft, who locate their European headquarters in Ireland, because it has a lower corporation tax rate than the UK.

According to the Guardian (so it must be true), Google also used company structures in Bermuda – where the corporation tax rate is zero – to shelter profits. Whilst such structures are legal, and Google states “it has abided by international tax rules,” is this an adequate defence? What would happen if every UK business did this?

Whilst Google has now agreed to change its accounting system so that a higher proportion of sales activity is registered in Britain rather than Ireland, why on Earth does the UK government not insist ALL of its turnover generated in the UK is treated to our tax laws in the UK, like the rest of us?

Google pledges to pay more tax on sales in the UK in the future, but at the paltry percentage of 3.42% negotiated by our government, I see this as a big win for Google who must be high-fiving in the boardroom back in Silicon Valley. It’s not clear, but the percentage could be significantly lower as the Google representative says the £130m is for a number of years! This would mean that it is a fraction of one percent!

A blinkered HMRC spokesman said: “The successful conclusion of HMRC enquiries has secured a substantial result, which means that Google will pay the full tax due in law on profits that belong in the UK.”

The same spokesperson would possibly have done better if they’d referred to the profits and turnover of the whole business to calculate what is outstanding in the UK and looked at the proportions. They have clearly duped the government and this is purely a cosmetic victory for the UK.

Google, along with other US companies such as Facebook, Amazon and Starbucks, have faced heavy criticism for their tax affairs. I blogged years ago explaining that UKFast paid significantly more tax than Starbucks, and 300% more than Facebook in 2012, whilst Google paid £6m off £385m, a mere 1.51%.

People wonder why all of these businesses are able to expand so fast. Look at the resources they have at their fingertips.

Matt Brittin of Google talks turnover and profit .... it was this big.

Matt Brittin of Google talks size of the opportunity in the UK
…. it is this big.

Margaret Hodge, the Labour MP and former chairwoman of the Parliamentary Public Accounts Committee, described its tax structures as “devious, calculated and, in my view, unethical”.

Well said Margaret!

The point in all of this is that it’s not a level playing field. Would you allow an American boxer to have heavier gloves in a boxing match against a British fighter? Or allow an American Tennis player three points to every one a British player wins? Of course not, but this is exactly what is happening in business.

I recently read an article where it pointed out that Britain lacks a tech billionaire and that the US is full of them. Whilst this is true, in our defence when a sizeable share of your profits are handed over to the government, you have to make do with what remains.

If all UK entrepreneurs took advantage of the tax rules that apply to off-shore businesses, yes, they’d be able to accelerate their wealth, but Britain would collapse. It’s the SME tax-paying entrepreneur that props up this wonderful country.

So, in answer to Google’s response that they are only taking advantage of the rules and that it is all completely legal, fine, but as a British person, whilst I could do the same, I don’t because I care about the British people and the British economy. I want to build better hospitals and better schools. A better economy, a balanced economy made up of fair contribution.

I have a meeting with Google on Monday morning at my offices and I can’t help feeling aggrieved. Google is not the brand it once was. In my eyes it’s tarnished. It’s taken advantage of the UK population. It’s over diversified and its search results are a shadow of the heady decade of 2000. People use the internet differently these days and they have a good idea where they are going when they open their laptop, and even more so with phones since the explosion of Apps.

Matt Brittin of Google talks turnover and profit .... it was this big.

Matt Brittin of Google talks turnover and size of opportunity
…. it is this big.

I am not the only one who is skeptical about Google’s recent press release saying it’s now contributing.

John McDonnell, Labour’s shadow chancellor, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme it’s a “relatively trivial” amount of money and the agreement looked like a “sweetheart deal.”

Conservative MP Mark Garnier, a member of the Treasury Select Committee, made the understatement of 2016 and its only January, saying the agreement represents a “relatively small” amount of money compared with Google’s UK profits. We should possibly send Mark back to Maths lessons to work on his fractions!

The quote that riles me the most is from Matt Brittin, head of Google Europe, who said, “If we were British, we would make most of our profits in the UK and we’d be paying a lot more tax in the UK. The facts are we are an American company and that is where we pay the majority of our taxes, that is where we make the majority of our profits.”

Matt Brittin of Google talks turnover and profit .... the profit, it was this big.

Matt Brittin of Google talks profit
…. it was this big.

Wow! “If we were British!” I think you can read between the lines. But what he fails to realise is that when you are British, you are less likely to want to disadvantage your own.

Before you start bashing the government on this matter, just remember that this has been going on for years. Through many governments, Labour and Conservative alike;  it’s far from over in my opinion, but I do still think the way to deal with this is to buy British.

If you can trade with a UK company over a US or global one, BUY british. I love the fact the French buy French cars. They are so proud and, as such, have held on to their car manufacturing. We have lost ours, but it’s not too late to bolster the economy and create new wealth that stays in Britain and helps develop society.

Just remember every time you buy from a company that takes the money off shore, the country is worse off, significantly worse off.

Buy local if you can, but definitely buy British at all times where possible and take control of this issue. Some years back we chose to only buy services from clients who host with UKFast and we make a concerted effort to buy British at all times where possible. It’s certainly strengthened our business and also built up a great network of like-minded businesses who understand us and vice versa.

As a British entrepreneur I am proud to be a sizeable contributor to our economy. We can all be proud of what we are building together. Make Britain stronger!

Best LJ

Comments

  1. Leigh Bowden Leigh Bowden says:

    I’ve thought of the Googles of this world as being almost parasitic in nature. Exploiting an educated work force educated at tax payers expense and then not contributing to that education. Worse probably belly aching about how the education system isn’t fit for purpose. HMRC should have used US tax filings to see what was going on in the UK.

  2. thanks for sharing I like your blog about the mind maps out your goals your last blog. I also enjoyed reading this blog as well I totally agree tax money should be paid in Britain so that we can invest in schools, hospitals, public services business should be transparent accountable honest. Our country at the moment is going back to Victorian times sad that it is their shouldn’t be homeless in our streets food banks what happened to the flood areas before the Christmas period and after and communities like Cumbria came together and beyond to help their fellow man. For me riches are not about monetary gain but about the world we live in. As a parent I wonder what kind of world we’ll live our children and future generations we have a world full of people who are powerful and greedy. Are we not our brothers keeper. I agree it’s been going on for years with different governments if you sell in Britain you should pay taxes. Look around our country it once was a great nation but slowly I feel that were becoming obsolete with zero contracts longer hours less pay. We are a rich country why do we need food banks why is the homeless on the streets why does the government think privatising companies are going to be better. For me I just think about global warming air pollution the wars we here everyday on the news have we not learnt about past atrocities and learnt from these sad but in my heart I don’t think so. Thanks again always like reading your blog it’s informative and gets me to think I hope you and your family have a great year take care Lynda Anne Sherlock.

  3. This is a great read, having just signed off in excess of £200.000 in corporation tax from our business, just lost an account to a competitor who’s tax affairs mirror that of some of the businesses mentioned should we doing more to highlight this to the consumer? Or client? What would be your advice ?

  4. It’s a great question. It’s all about ethics and “yes” in my opinion. We should be running businesses ethically and encouraging people to trade with us and making sure we remember to highlight these points in our marketing. These days I’d like to think clients do care and also people want to work for great businesses too.
    Thanks for stopping by and contributing. If you are paying tax you are doing Ok! Keep it up, keep positive and keep in touch. Best LJ

  5. ‘Some years back we chose to only buy services from clients who host with UKFast’ – So all the money UKFast pay for Google ad words, am I to now assume Google use UKFast data centre rather their own? – I think not.

  6. Hi Shaun

    We have done work and collaborated with Google, sadly not in the same scale. But later in the post a few sentences later I explain “where possible.” There will always be things where we have to make a choice.

    We have scaled back Google significantly in recent times and looked for alternative advertising sources.

    We have also refused hundreds of thousands of pounds in marketing rebates from Microsoft over the years too. But I wouldn’t expect other people to follow suit, this is purely something I believed strongly in.

    I am a great believer in a level playing field. I know there is no such thing as utopia however there is nothing wrong with working towards or aiming at one.

    I have a goal to help make Manchester stronger as a tech community. That means creating an environment where we all benefit, that includes Teledata and many other competitors. But together if we coordinate our efforts and initiatives we are able to strengthen the NorthWest and eventually the whole of the UK economy. You have already started on this journey by providing the services you do.

    It’s disappointing to see that I frustrate you so much but hey, I understand!

    Thanks for stopping by and contributing.

    Best LJ

  7. Looks like this one has still some time to run. “George Osborne faces further questions over the Google tax deal, with calls for greater transparency about how the £130m settlement was reached”.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-35413109

  8. Shaun Shaun says:

    Lawrence,

    Thanks for posting my comment and answering it, it was more tongue in cheek on my part but your answer was fair play and commendable.

    I have a lot of respect for what you have achieved at UKFast, well done to you and everyone involved. It’s something to be incredibly proud of, not just as a business but for the whole of Manchester.

    I truly share your passion for putting Manchester firmly on the technology map. It’s very important in any market to differentiate the product, rather than just trying to emulate the successes of others. The team at TeleData have done an great job at mobilising our plans in the 18 months since I have joined.

    I look forward to watching both of our businesses grow in their unique ways..

    Watch this space 🙂 in the meantime, let’s do the right thing and pay our tax bills!

    Kindest regards

    Shaun

  9. Great to hear from you and thanks for contributing.

Leave a Reply

  • Lawrence Jones of UKFast on the Suppo...

  • Lawrence Jones of UKFast on the impor...

  • Lawrence Jones MBE, CEO of UKFast on ...

  • Lawrence Jones Inspire Interview Part 2

View all videos >