<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Dark Brown The New Black?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawrencejones.eu/search-marketing/2009/04/16/is-dark-brown-the-new-black/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawrencejones.eu/search-marketing/2009/04/16/is-dark-brown-the-new-black/</link>
	<description>Success Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:03:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.lawrencejones.eu/search-marketing/2009/04/16/is-dark-brown-the-new-black/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawrencejones.eu/search-marketing/?p=255#comment-123</guid>
		<description>I have just read the Opinion within the Sunday Times, by Matthew Parris, a usually mild mannered chap who is careful not to stamp on his victims. Today he writes about Brown, and he apologises for previously describing Brown as having both a good and bad side. He retracts his statement saying it is &quot;half right. There isn&#039;t a good Gordon. He&#039;s useless. His behaviour is horrid.&quot; 

He lists some of the headline grabbing initiatives that Brown spouts on about and describes how the initiatives all fizzle out. It is a scathing attack of a Prime Minister on the ropes and in my opinion a justified one.

I get the feeling, there is more to come and journalists are lining up to take a bite. Why not? He insults them more than he does the nation. How? Because he has fed them snippets of information which they have respectfully published only to find out that there is a common theme unravelling. 

Is Brown&#039;s talk cheap? It certainly doesn&#039;t look like he is delivering on his word. Yes, he has clever speech writers who help him choose the correct language to manipulate our minds, however, he doesn&#039;t believe what he is saying and he is making a mockery of us all.

Personally I am not  equipped to judge Brown as a politician, however I am skeptical of his natural leadership qualities or rather his lack of them. He is nervous when delivering simple truths and has a &quot;tick&quot; with his throat which is often described as grotesque. 

But the real fear is in his lack of ability to congratualte and honour those around him for the successes and accomplishments that he is a part of. A real leader descibes himself as fortunate, lucky, he gives credit to everyone but himself. Are these traits that sound familiar with Gordon Brown?

They certainly don&#039;t come naturally in him. Quite the contrary, and a good example of this in my opinion is his description of the head start he got at school.

I quote Wikipedia:

&quot;Brown was educated first at Kirkcaldy West Primary School where he was selected for an experimental fast stream education programme, which took him two years early to Kirkcaldy High School for an academic hothouse education taught in separate classes. At age 16 he wrote that he loathed and resented this &quot;ludicrous&quot; experiment on young lives.&quot;

Fancy being fortunate enough to get a head start in education like that, the one area which allowed him to excel in later life, yet he uses words like &quot;loathes&quot; and &quot;ludicrous experiment.&quot;

It certainly made an impression on him, as he built a career publicising &quot;ludicrous experiments.&quot; The irony being, how many children, like he was, now curse the Brown brainchild who dreamt up some of the most stupid, tax hungry pointless initiatives the world has ever seen.

Sadly if you are a labour supporter, there is no chance of re-election with the one eyed man at the helm who chooses to put the telescope to the wrong eye to avoid facing the chilling truth.

If you believe in karma and you really do believe that he has manipulated his position with in his office, if he is a bully, if he is really that despicable, it is only a matter of time. The people who put him there will be just as quick to remove him. And it will be bloody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just read the Opinion within the Sunday Times, by Matthew Parris, a usually mild mannered chap who is careful not to stamp on his victims. Today he writes about Brown, and he apologises for previously describing Brown as having both a good and bad side. He retracts his statement saying it is &#8220;half right. There isn&#8217;t a good Gordon. He&#8217;s useless. His behaviour is horrid.&#8221; </p>
<p>He lists some of the headline grabbing initiatives that Brown spouts on about and describes how the initiatives all fizzle out. It is a scathing attack of a Prime Minister on the ropes and in my opinion a justified one.</p>
<p>I get the feeling, there is more to come and journalists are lining up to take a bite. Why not? He insults them more than he does the nation. How? Because he has fed them snippets of information which they have respectfully published only to find out that there is a common theme unravelling. </p>
<p>Is Brown&#8217;s talk cheap? It certainly doesn&#8217;t look like he is delivering on his word. Yes, he has clever speech writers who help him choose the correct language to manipulate our minds, however, he doesn&#8217;t believe what he is saying and he is making a mockery of us all.</p>
<p>Personally I am not  equipped to judge Brown as a politician, however I am skeptical of his natural leadership qualities or rather his lack of them. He is nervous when delivering simple truths and has a &#8220;tick&#8221; with his throat which is often described as grotesque. </p>
<p>But the real fear is in his lack of ability to congratualte and honour those around him for the successes and accomplishments that he is a part of. A real leader descibes himself as fortunate, lucky, he gives credit to everyone but himself. Are these traits that sound familiar with Gordon Brown?</p>
<p>They certainly don&#8217;t come naturally in him. Quite the contrary, and a good example of this in my opinion is his description of the head start he got at school.</p>
<p>I quote Wikipedia:</p>
<p>&#8220;Brown was educated first at Kirkcaldy West Primary School where he was selected for an experimental fast stream education programme, which took him two years early to Kirkcaldy High School for an academic hothouse education taught in separate classes. At age 16 he wrote that he loathed and resented this &#8220;ludicrous&#8221; experiment on young lives.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fancy being fortunate enough to get a head start in education like that, the one area which allowed him to excel in later life, yet he uses words like &#8220;loathes&#8221; and &#8220;ludicrous experiment.&#8221;</p>
<p>It certainly made an impression on him, as he built a career publicising &#8220;ludicrous experiments.&#8221; The irony being, how many children, like he was, now curse the Brown brainchild who dreamt up some of the most stupid, tax hungry pointless initiatives the world has ever seen.</p>
<p>Sadly if you are a labour supporter, there is no chance of re-election with the one eyed man at the helm who chooses to put the telescope to the wrong eye to avoid facing the chilling truth.</p>
<p>If you believe in karma and you really do believe that he has manipulated his position with in his office, if he is a bully, if he is really that despicable, it is only a matter of time. The people who put him there will be just as quick to remove him. And it will be bloody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

